User talk:Farnaj57

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Farnaj57, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Moxy🍁 14:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Intoxicated by Love, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Persian and Turkish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Intoxicated by Love poster (hande erçel).png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Intoxicated by Love poster (hande erçel).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Intoxicated by Love poster (Mevlana).png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Intoxicated by Love poster (Mevlana).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Intoxicated by Love official poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Intoxicated by Love official poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article size[edit]

Pls review WP:CANYOUREADTHIS and WP:SIZERULE. Moxy🍁 00:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Yeah I know this, but some sections needed updates ASAP, and most of the info were expired or not even mentioned. I'm trying my best to just update the article rather than adding stuff, and I'm pretty much done. Thanks! Farnaj57 (talk) 00:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! HistoryofIran (talk) 23:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Neo-Assyrian Empire, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Iran. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, you accused me of being "Pro-Mullah" with zero evidence whatsoever, while it was I who literally updated both the Human Rights and censorship sections with the most Anti-Mullah info possible, all heavily-sourced. You're recommending me to read Wikipedia's "guidelines", while the one who truly needs to read is you, so you can learn about how to see the article's revision history, and find what I've actually edited.

Secondly, I'm not againts that quote at all, a 25 year old quote is just not appropriate to have in a article where everything is constantly updating, whether the info is right or wrong, doesn't matter.

What is this website becoming? Absolute waste of time to read let alone contribute at this point... Farnaj57 (talk) 23:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was perhaps a bit too hasty in my edit summary and apologize for it. However, there was questionable changes which lessened what the regime actually is known for, including the lede, which I restored [1]. Moreover, if the 25 year old source is right... then why shouldn't it be there? What has changed? HistoryofIran (talk) 23:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I've said, a 25 year old quote is not appropriate to have in a article when everything is constantly updating. It should be removed, or at the very least, replaced with a newer quote.

It's laughable when I see all the article's info is from 2023-2024, while this part is from 25 years ago...

That part needs to be removed or replaced no matter what. Farnaj57 (talk) 06:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not convincing. If the info is still correct, then it shouldnt be removed unless that has changed in the regime. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to argue with you over a small thing, but if you want that part to exist, it should be transferred to the human rights section because it... affects the people's rights, not the government. This is the same with Saudi Arabia's page aswell. I don't want to do an edit and then you revert it or vice versa, so you do this, and let's get over it. Farnaj57 (talk) 12:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It talks about its system, including its elections (the latter which is only mentioned in the Government and politics section), so why should it be moved there? HistoryofIran (talk) 21:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because its too small of a info to be outside the sections, otherwise it should be greatly expanded and have its own section. I've gave you an example (Saudi Arabia), take a look at the all country pages you want, none of them look like this. I see no problem with it, especially when it's the case with all pages. So if you edit it, great, if don't, I'll do it myself tomorrow. Farnaj57 (talk) 22:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saadi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop deleting warnings and messages on your talk page[edit]

In Wikipedia we don't ignore any messages by deleting or maybe just not reading them. Remember spreading Iranian regime propaganda is not allowed here. FreeZoneF (talk) 21:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since when changing images is considered "propaganda"? You are reverting literally every single edit I make, when all I did was just updating the page with new citations and updated info. No wonder why millions of people, including university professors, are saying that Wikipedia is not a reliable source, they're %100 right... People like you are making this website an absolute waste of time to even read, let alone contribute. Farnaj57 (talk) 21:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They are definitely right. Yes, we Wikipedia users may not have a university degree. And yes! Wikipedia is not a good source. The content you removed was agreed upon by users over the years and is also good content. I feel that you are not neutral when it comes to articles related to Iran. Some of your edits specifically censor Pahlavi rule and the word Pars. I think you censor article for Iranian regime. Maybe I'm wrong. The solution is to become more familiar with the concept of neutrality. FreeZoneF (talk) 22:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even if there were some problems with my or anyone's edits, we should improve upon it, not reverting the whole thing. Maybe there was some problems with my recent edits, but my last one was just changing some of the images to new ones, I don't think there was anything wrong with that, go and see it for yourself, I did not change literally any info on the article body, only some images. Can you bring that back and end this? I don't want to revert it myself and you revert it again. There was truly nothing wrong with my last edit man... Farnaj57 (talk) 22:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is, your edits are not that helpful too. For example we don't give images size until it's necessary. It can totally change user's view on different browsers. You did that. Cinema and theater are not the same, they need separated sections... There are many "little things" about your edits. FreeZoneF (talk) 22:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that you are reverting the whole thing. I agreed that maybe some of my edits was not that good, but you're not willing to accept that reverting people's entire efforts is not a good move. Bring back my edit, and do what you're saying now (separated sections etc.). Again, I don't want to bring it back myself and get reverted again. Farnaj57 (talk) 22:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The admin Moxy is now demanding for some images to be removed, I have to do it, do not revert my upcoming edit, its a need at this point... Farnaj57 (talk) 07:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]