Talk:Nina Popova (official)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Photos[edit]

Photo discussion is here. SusunW (talk) 22:03, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nina Popova (official)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: SusunW (talk · contribs) 14:12, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Kusma (talk · contribs) 16:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Will review this one. Review to follow over the next few days. —Kusma (talk) 16:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Content and prose review[edit]

Early life and education[edit]

  • I do not think the family details should be stated in wikivoice. Talaver 2023 attributes them to Borisova and does not mention the names or the relation to the archbishop, or the details of what they ate to avoid starvation (some of this might be family legends).
  • I am pretty sure the "elevator" is a grain elevator, compare s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Elets.
  • Did the mother die during the 1921/22 famine, or soon after the father's 1920 death? In the lead she seems to die in 1920.
  • Borisoglebsk: mention where it is? (350km/over 200 miles ESE from Yelets?)
  • Do we know anything about the background and the patronymic of Andrey Shamshin? (the article Renita Grigoryeva states "Andrei Semyonovich Shamshin (1903–1972), a scientist-agronomist")
  • She did not really study at Moscow State University, but at ru:Московский институт философии, литературы и истории, which as far as I can tell was independent at the time.
  • My inner language nerd would prefer to see the Renita initialism explained in Cyrillic, but that is certainly not in the GA criteria.

Career: Early period[edit]

Soon. —Kusma (talk) 19:20, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

Check later.

Source spotchecks[edit]

  • Not so sure Borisova should be treated as fully reliable; with the dialogue form, it seems closer to a primary than a secondary source to me.


General comments and GA criteria[edit]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed